Review · Platformer · PC
Assignment 1 (lukephilipps)
Reviewed: 15 Jun 2026
PC
lukephilipps · 2023
Ludograph rating
Growth (BDS)
33
Risk (RIS)
10
Daily limit
120min
Age guidance
–
Developmental benefits
| B1 | Cognitive | 0.40 | |
| B2 | Social-emotional | 0.00 | |
| B3 | Motor | 0.65 | |
This simple platformer offers a basic challenge in spatial awareness and fine motor control, requiring players to adapt to somewhat rough controls. The inclusion of checkpoints and a secret area provides minor problem-solving opportunities.
Design risks
| R1 | Compulsion-loop pressure | 0.20 | |
| R2 | Monetization | 0.04 | |
| R3 | Social risk | 0.00 | |
The primary risk is the lack of an in-game exit, which can be frustrating and penalizes players for taking breaks as progress is lost. The rough controls might also lead to frustration.
Content (not in risk score)
| R4.1 | Violence Level | 0.00 | |
| R4.2 | Sexual Content | 0.00 | |
| R4.3 | Language | 0.00 | |
| R4.4 | Substance References | 0.00 | |
| R4.5 | Fear / Horror | 0.00 | |
Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.
Regulatory design checks · DSA — Not yet assessed·GDPR-K — Not yet assessed·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria
- DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.
- GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.
- ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.
These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.