Compare this game
Back to the Future: The Game - Episode 2. Get Tannen

Review · Adventure · PC · PlayStation 3 · macOS

Back to the Future: The Game - Episode 2. Get Tannen

Reviewed: 16 May 2026

PC · PlayStation 3 · macOS

Telltale Games · 2011

Ludograph rating

C

Mixed

50 /100

Automated review
06010030Benefit →Low risk →B 33 · R 0
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

33

Risk (RIS)

0

Daily limit

120min

Age guidance

7+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.50
B2Social-emotional
0.20
B3Motor
0.10

Back to the Future: The Game - Episode 2. Get Tannen is a narrative-driven adventure game that encourages problem-solving, critical thinking, and reading comprehension. Players must interact with characters and the environment to solve puzzles and progress the story, which can enhance cognitive skills. The game's strong emphasis on dialogue and story also supports language development.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.00
R2Monetization
0.00
R3Social risk
0.00

The game contains mild cartoon violence, infrequent mild language, and some references to alcohol and smoking, consistent with the source material. These elements are not gratuitous and are generally presented in a lighthearted, comedic context. There are no significant compulsion-loop design or monetization risks.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.33
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.33
R4.4Substance References
0.33
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.00

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

Avg playtime~3 hReviewedMay 2026Report a data error →How scores are calculated →

Parents ask…

Is Back to the Future: The Game - Episode 2. Get Tannen safe for kids?

Ludograph gives Back to the Future: The Game - Episode 2. Get Tannen a rating of 50/100, recommended for ages 7 and up. It delivers genuine benefits but carries design risks that deserve a close look.

What age is Back to the Future: The Game - Episode 2. Get Tannen appropriate for?

Ludograph's rubric recommends a minimum age of 7+ for Back to the Future: The Game - Episode 2. Get Tannen, based on benefits, risks, and content review.

How long should kids play Back to the Future: The Game - Episode 2. Get Tannen?

Our session recommendation for Back to the Future: The Game - Episode 2. Get Tannen is up to 120 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of Back to the Future: The Game - Episode 2. Get Tannen?

The game contains mild cartoon violence, infrequent mild language, and some references to alcohol and smoking, consistent with the source material. These elements are not gratuitous and are generally presented in a lighthearted, comedic context. There are no significant compulsion-loop design or monetization risks.