
Review · Simulation · PC
CacaClicker
Reviewed: 22 Jun 2026
PC
CacaClicker · 2026
Ludograph rating
Growth (BDS)
12
Risk (RIS)
39
Daily limit
30min
Age guidance
–
Developmental benefits
| B1 | Cognitive | 0.20 | |
| B2 | Social-emotional | 0.00 | |
| B3 | Motor | 0.10 | |
CacaClicker offers minimal cognitive benefits, primarily engaging players in basic strategic thinking for optimizing upgrade paths and managing resources. The 'Corrupted Mode' provides some adaptive challenge, and the casino elements introduce basic probability. However, the core gameplay loop is designed for low-effort, continuous engagement rather than deep cognitive development.
Design risks
| R1 | Compulsion-loop pressure | 0.70 | |
| R2 | Monetization | 0.25 | |
| R3 | Social risk | 0.00 | |
CacaClicker exhibits high levels of compulsion-loop design, characteristic of incremental games. It features infinite play loops, variable rewards through its casino and upgrade systems, and strong streak mechanics/FOMO with daily rewards. The game is designed to be left running and lacks natural stopping points, actively penalizing breaks through missed daily rewards. Monetization risks include the use of a premium currency ('Crottos') which can obscure real-world spending, and frequent prompts to engage with microtransactions to accelerate progress.
Content (not in risk score)
| R4.1 | Violence Level | 0.00 | |
| R4.2 | Sexual Content | 0.00 | |
| R4.3 | Language | 0.33 | |
| R4.4 | Substance References | 0.00 | |
| R4.5 | Fear / Horror | 0.00 | |
Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.
Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: concerns noted·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria
- DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. Likely violations: virtual currency that obscures real-money prices.
- GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
- ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.
These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.