Compare this game
Can we still get high

Review · Adventure · PC

Can we still get high

Reviewed: 21 Jun 2026

PC

YAD Project · 2024

Ludograph rating

B

Good

66 /100

Automated review
06010030Benefit →Low risk →B 49 · R 0
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

49

Risk (RIS)

0

Daily limit

120min

Age guidance

7+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.52
B2Social-emotional
0.33
B3Motor
0.65

Can we still get high is a dynamic platformer that challenges players with exciting levels, dangers, traps, and puzzles, fostering problem-solving, spatial awareness, and reaction time. Its multiplayer mode encourages teamwork and communication, while unique character abilities and replayability promote learning and adaptive thinking.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.00
R2Monetization
0.00
R3Social risk
0.00

The game presents mild content risks with cartoon violence against robots and potentially spooky elements in an abandoned factory. The suggestive title 'Can we still get high' could be misinterpreted, though the game's description does not indicate actual substance references.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.33
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.00
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.33

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

ReviewedJun 2026Report a data error →How scores are calculated →

Parents ask…

Is Can we still get high safe for kids?

Ludograph gives Can we still get high a rating of 66/100, recommended for ages 7 and up. It offers solid benefits but needs parental guidance on the risks.

What age is Can we still get high appropriate for?

Ludograph's rubric recommends a minimum age of 7+ for Can we still get high, based on benefits, risks, and content review.

How long should kids play Can we still get high?

Our session recommendation for Can we still get high is up to 120 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of Can we still get high?

The game presents mild content risks with cartoon violence against robots and potentially spooky elements in an abandoned factory. The suggestive title 'Can we still get high' could be misinterpreted, though the game's description does not indicate actual substance references.