Compare this game
Card Crawl

Review · RPG · macOS · Android · iOS

Card Crawl

Reviewed: 30 Apr 2026

macOS · Android · iOS · PC

Arnold Rauers · 2015

Ludograph rating

D

Caution

35 /100

Card Crawl is a solitaire-style card game that builds strategic thinking and problem-solving through dungeon crawling and deck-building mechanics.

06010030BenefitLow riskB 23 · R 27
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

23

Risk (RIS)

27

Daily limit

90min

Age guidance

7+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.52
B2Social-emotional
0.00
B3Motor
0.15

Card Crawl is a solitaire-style card game that heavily emphasizes strategic thinking, problem-solving, and critical thinking through its dungeon crawling mechanics and deck-building. Players must manage their inventory, make tactical decisions with item cards, and slay monsters, all contributing to the development of cognitive skills. The adaptive challenge comes from unlocking new ability cards and creating unique decks, which encourages learning and transfer of strategies.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.13
R2Monetization
0.00
R3Social risk
0.11

The game has minimal social or emotional engagement, as it is a single-player experience. While there's no direct monetization, the game does utilize some mild compulsion-loop design tactics through variable rewards when unlocking new cards and near misses during gameplay. There's a slight competitive toxicity and social comparison due to Game Center leaderboards. Content risks are low, with only a minor level of fantasy violence.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.33
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.00
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.00

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Regulatory design checks · DSAAssessed: meets criteria·GDPR-KAssessed: meets criteria·ODDSAssessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

Parents ask…

Is Card Crawl safe for kids?

Ludograph gives Card Crawl a rating of 35/100, recommended for ages 7 and up. There are notable risks worth knowing before letting kids play.

What age is Card Crawl appropriate for?

Ludograph's rubric recommends a minimum age of 7+ for Card Crawl, based on benefits, risks, and content review.

How long should kids play Card Crawl?

Our session recommendation for Card Crawl is up to 90 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of Card Crawl?

The game has minimal social or emotional engagement, as it is a single-player experience. While there's no direct monetization, the game does utilize some mild compulsion-loop design tactics through variable rewards when unlocking new cards and near misses during gameplay. There's a slight competitive toxicity and social comparison due to Game Center leaderboards. Content risks are low, with only