Compare this game
Cromwell

Review · Educational · PC

Cromwell

Reviewed: 31 May 2026

PC

The Digital Technologist · 2020

Ludograph rating

B

Good

65 /100

Automated review
06010030Benefit →Low risk →B 48 · R 0
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

48

Risk (RIS)

0

Daily limit

120min

Age guidance

7+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.74
B2Social-emotional
0.30
B3Motor
0.10

Cromwell: King In All But Name offers a unique educational experience, immersing players in a pivotal period of British history. It fosters critical thinking and strategic decision-making as players navigate complex political and social challenges. The game's historical 'Info Button' and 'Divergence Indicator' encourage learning and reflection, while the built-in editors promote creativity and engagement with the historical content.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.00
R2Monetization
0.00
R3Social risk
0.00

The game presents minimal risks. As a solo, text-based experience, it avoids social risks like competitive toxicity or stranger interaction. Monetization risks are absent, and compulsion-loop design mechanics are not evident in its design. Content risks are low, with only implied historical violence.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.33
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.00
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.00

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

ReviewedMay 2026Report a data error →How scores are calculated →

Parents ask…

Is Cromwell safe for kids?

Ludograph gives Cromwell a rating of 65/100, recommended for ages 7 and up. It offers solid benefits but needs parental guidance on the risks.

What age is Cromwell appropriate for?

Ludograph's rubric recommends a minimum age of 7+ for Cromwell, based on benefits, risks, and content review.

How long should kids play Cromwell?

Our session recommendation for Cromwell is up to 120 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of Cromwell?

The game presents minimal risks. As a solo, text-based experience, it avoids social risks like competitive toxicity or stranger interaction. Monetization risks are absent, and compulsion-loop design mechanics are not evident in its design. Content risks are low, with only implied historical violence.