Compare this game
Crowntakers

Review · RPG · macOS · iOS · Android

Crowntakers

Reviewed: 01 May 2026

macOS · iOS · Android · PC · Linux

Kalypso Media · 2014

Ludograph rating

B

Good

60 /100

Automated review

Crowntakers is a turn-based strategy RPG that strengthens problem solving, strategic thinking, and critical thinking through challenging gameplay.

06010030Benefit →Low risk →B 43 · R 2
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

43

Risk (RIS)

2

Daily limit

120min

Age guidance

13+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.72
B2Social-emotional
0.13
B3Motor
0.15

Crowntakers is a turn-based strategy RPG that significantly develops cognitive skills such as strategic thinking, problem-solving, and critical thinking through its challenging encounters and resource management. The roguelike, procedurally generated world fosters adaptive challenge and replayability, encouraging players to learn and transfer strategies. It offers a rich, engaging experience with minimal manipulative design.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.03
R2Monetization
0.00
R3Social risk
0.00

This game presents very low risks. It has no microtransactions, loot boxes, or subscriptions, eliminating monetization pressure. As a single-player experience, it carries no social risks like competitive toxicity or stranger interaction. Content risks are mild, consistent with its Teen rating, involving fantasy violence and mild language, but no sexual content or substance references. Compulsion-loop design mechanics are negligible, focusing on genuine gameplay engagement rather than addictive loops.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.67
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.33
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.33

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

Avg playtime~4 hReviewedMay 2026Report a data error →How scores are calculated →

Parents ask…

Is Crowntakers safe for kids?

Ludograph gives Crowntakers a rating of 60/100, recommended for ages 13 and up. It offers solid benefits but needs parental guidance on the risks.

What age is Crowntakers appropriate for?

Ludograph's rubric recommends a minimum age of 13+ for Crowntakers, based on benefits, risks, and content review.

How long should kids play Crowntakers?

Our session recommendation for Crowntakers is up to 120 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of Crowntakers?

This game presents very low risks. It has no microtransactions, loot boxes, or subscriptions, eliminating monetization pressure. As a single-player experience, it carries no social risks like competitive toxicity or stranger interaction. Content risks are mild, consistent with its Teen rating, involving fantasy violence and mild language, but no sexual content or substance references. Compulsion-l