Compare this game
Doorway 2

Review · Racing · PC

Doorway 2

Reviewed: 26 Jun 2026

PC

Elephant Dave Studios · 2025

Ludograph rating

B

Good

64 /100

Automated review
06010030Benefit →Low risk →B 51 · R 16
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

51

Risk (RIS)

16

Daily limit

90min

Age guidance

7+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.64
B2Social-emotional
0.13
B3Motor
0.75

Doorway 2 excels in developing cognitive and motor skills, particularly problem-solving, spatial awareness, hand-eye coordination, and reaction time, due to its high-speed parkour and precision-focused gameplay. The game's quick retry system fosters resilience and a growth mindset by minimizing frustration from failure and encouraging continuous learning and improvement.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.17
R2Monetization
0.04
R3Social risk
0.28

The primary risks in Doorway 2 stem from its competitive multiplayer and online leaderboards, which could lead to social comparison and competitive toxicity. While microtransactions are present, they appear to be low risk, and the game design actively mitigates loss aversion and artificial stopping barriers. The continuous flow design, however, may make it difficult for players to find natural stopping points, potentially leading to longer play sessions.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.33
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.00
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.33

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Heads up

  • Monthly spendTypical real-money spend by engaged players: $5 – $10/mo.

Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

ReviewedJun 2026Report a data error →How scores are calculated →

Parents ask…

Is Doorway 2 safe for kids?

Ludograph gives Doorway 2 a rating of 64/100, recommended for ages 7 and up. It offers solid benefits but needs parental guidance on the risks.

What age is Doorway 2 appropriate for?

Ludograph's rubric recommends a minimum age of 7+ for Doorway 2, based on benefits, risks, and content review.

How long should kids play Doorway 2?

Our session recommendation for Doorway 2 is up to 90 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of Doorway 2?

The primary risks in Doorway 2 stem from its competitive multiplayer and online leaderboards, which could lead to social comparison and competitive toxicity. While microtransactions are present, they appear to be low risk, and the game design actively mitigates loss aversion and artificial stopping barriers. The continuous flow design, however, may make it difficult for players to find natural sto