Compare this game
Dreadman

Review · Action · PC

Dreadman

Reviewed: 09 May 2026

PC

Alex Carlson · 2015

Ludograph rating

E

Avoid

31 /100

Automated review

Dreadman is an action game that offers moderate benefits in spatial awareness, adaptive challenge, and hand-eye coordination through its combat.

06010030Benefit →Low risk →B 18 · R 0
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

18

Risk (RIS)

0

Daily limit

120min

Age guidance

9+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.22
B2Social-emotional
0.00
B3Motor
0.35

Dreadman is a simple, engaging beat-em-up that offers moderate benefits in spatial awareness, reaction time, and adaptive challenge through its side-scrolling combat. Players will need to anticipate enemy movements and react quickly to successfully progress through levels. The game's straightforward mechanics make it easy to pick up and play for short bursts.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.00
R2Monetization
0.00
R3Social risk
0.00

Dreadman presents minimal risks. The violence is cartoonish and played for laughs, with no significant content concerns. There are no monetization pressures, social risks, or compulsion-loop design mechanics present. The game is a simple, self-contained experience.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.33
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.00
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.00

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

ReviewedMay 2026Report a data error →How scores are calculated →

Parents ask…

Is Dreadman safe for kids?

Ludograph gives Dreadman a rating of 31/100, recommended for ages 9 and up. Significant risks make this hard to recommend for younger players.

What age is Dreadman appropriate for?

Ludograph's rubric recommends a minimum age of 9+ for Dreadman, based on benefits, risks, and content review.

How long should kids play Dreadman?

Our session recommendation for Dreadman is up to 120 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of Dreadman?

Dreadman presents minimal risks. The violence is cartoonish and played for laughs, with no significant content concerns. There are no monetization pressures, social risks, or compulsion-loop design mechanics present. The game is a simple, self-contained experience.