Review · Action · Android · macOS · PC
Evoland 2
Reviewed: 01 May 2026
Android · macOS · PC · iOS
Plug In Digital · 2015
Ludograph rating
B
Good
63 /100
Evoland 2 is an action-adventure RPG that helps with learning transfer and problem-solving through its varied gameplay, presenting very low risks.
Growth (BDS)
46
Risk (RIS)
2
Daily limit
120min
Age guidance
7+
Developmental benefits
| B1 | Cognitive | 0.68 | |
| B2 | Social-emotional | 0.13 | |
| B3 | Motor | 0.40 | |
Evoland 2 offers a rich and varied gameplay experience that significantly benefits cognitive development, particularly in problem-solving, strategic thinking, and critical analysis due to its diverse combat systems and time-altering narrative. The game's unique blend of art styles and genre parodies fosters creativity and adaptive learning, as players constantly engage with new mechanics and historical contexts. Exploration and collectible hunting also enhance spatial awareness and memory.
Design risks
| R1 | Compulsion-loop pressure | 0.03 | |
| R2 | Monetization | 0.00 | |
| R3 | Social risk | 0.00 | |
This game presents very low risks across all categories. It features no microtransactions, loot boxes, or subscriptions, eliminating monetization pressures. As a single-player experience with no stranger chat, social risks are non-existent. Content risks are minimal, aligning with an E10+ rating, featuring mild fantasy violence appropriate for its age group. The game design does not employ manipulative compulsion loops or artificial engagement barriers.
Content (not in risk score)
| R4.1 | Violence Level | 0.33 | |
| R4.2 | Sexual Content | 0.00 | |
| R4.3 | Language | 0.00 | |
| R4.4 | Substance References | 0.00 | |
| R4.5 | Fear / Horror | 0.00 | |
Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.
Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria
- DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
- GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
- ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.
These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.