Review · Action · iOS · Android
Fantasica
Reviewed: 15 May 2026
iOS · Android
Mobage · 2012
Ludograph rating
Growth (BDS)
37
Risk (RIS)
15
Daily limit
120min
Age guidance
7+
Developmental benefits
| B1 | Cognitive | 0.52 | |
| B2 | Social-emotional | 0.17 | |
| B3 | Motor | 0.30 | |
Fantasica offers moderate strategic thinking and problem-solving through its card-based combat and team building. Players will engage their critical thinking and memory to optimize their card decks and battle formations. The adaptive challenge keeps players engaged by adjusting difficulty.
Design risks
| R1 | Compulsion-loop pressure | 0.30 | |
| R2 | Monetization | 0.00 | |
| R3 | Social risk | 0.06 | |
The primary risk in Fantasica is related to compulsion-loop design through variable rewards and frequent reward cycles, which can encourage extended play sessions. There is a minor risk of competitive toxicity in online leaderboards.
Content (not in risk score)
| R4.1 | Violence Level | 0.33 | |
| R4.2 | Sexual Content | 0.00 | |
| R4.3 | Language | 0.00 | |
| R4.4 | Substance References | 0.00 | |
| R4.5 | Fear / Horror | 0.00 | |
Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.
Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria
- DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
- GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
- ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.
These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.