Compare this game
FeedBack

Review · Adventure · PC

FeedBack

Reviewed: 27 Jun 2026

PC

FeedBack · 2024

Ludograph rating

D

Caution

39 /100

Automated review
06010030Benefit →Low risk →B 24 · R 2
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

24

Risk (RIS)

2

Daily limit

120min

Age guidance

7+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.30
B2Social-emotional
0.00
B3Motor
0.45

FeedBack offers a charming, nostalgic pixel art adventure that encourages problem-solving, spatial awareness, and strategic thinking as players navigate maps and cleverly avoid pirates to find treasure. The engaging gameplay and satisfying sound effects provide an immersive and fun experience.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.03
R2Monetization
0.00
R3Social risk
0.00

While FeedBack is largely free of manipulative design, monetization pressures, and social risks, its content includes mild fantasy violence involving a hero with a sword and fierce pirates. The game is solo-player, so it does not offer social-emotional development opportunities.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.33
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.00
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.00

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

ReviewedJun 2026Report a data error →How scores are calculated →

Parents ask…

Is FeedBack safe for kids?

Ludograph gives FeedBack a rating of 39/100, recommended for ages 7 and up. There are notable risks worth knowing before letting kids play.

What age is FeedBack appropriate for?

Ludograph's rubric recommends a minimum age of 7+ for FeedBack, based on benefits, risks, and content review.

How long should kids play FeedBack?

Our session recommendation for FeedBack is up to 120 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of FeedBack?

While FeedBack is largely free of manipulative design, monetization pressures, and social risks, its content includes mild fantasy violence involving a hero with a sword and fierce pirates. The game is solo-player, so it does not offer social-emotional development opportunities.