Compare this game
Fields of Battle

Review · Action · PC · iOS

Fields of Battle

Reviewed: 21 May 2026

PC · iOS

Super X Studios · 1995

Ludograph rating

C

Mixed

49 /100

Automated review
06010030Benefit →Low risk →B 43 · R 43
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

43

Risk (RIS)

43

Daily limit

–

Age guidance

17+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.40
B2Social-emotional
0.10
B3Motor
1.00

Fields of Battle offers intense, skill-based first-person shooter action, emphasizing strategic thinking, hand-eye coordination, and quick reflexes. Its adaptive online competitive environment provides continuous challenge and opportunities for skill development, especially with VR and motion control options.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.50
R2Monetization
0.17
R3Social risk
0.61

The game's competitive online nature, combined with leaderboards and live events, presents risks of social comparison, competitive toxicity, and a sense of obligation to play. The presence of microtransactions for gear upgrades raises concerns about pay-to-win dynamics. Content includes high levels of violence and potentially strong language.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
1.00
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.67
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.00

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Heads up

  • Monthly spendTypical real-money spend by engaged players: $5 – $50/mo.

Regulatory design checks · DSA — Not yet assessed·GDPR-K — Not yet assessed·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

Avg playtime~1 hReviewedMay 2026Report a data error →How scores are calculated →

Parents ask…

Is Fields of Battle safe for kids?

Ludograph gives Fields of Battle a rating of 49/100, recommended for ages 17 and up. It delivers genuine benefits but carries design risks that deserve a close look.

What age is Fields of Battle appropriate for?

Ludograph's rubric recommends a minimum age of 17+ for Fields of Battle, based on benefits, risks, and content review.

How long should kids play Fields of Battle?

We don't publish a daily session budget for Fields of Battle: its design-risk score sits in our highest band, where limiting time alone doesn't address the risks. For children we suggest choosing an alternative instead.

What are the main risks of Fields of Battle?

The game's competitive online nature, combined with leaderboards and live events, presents risks of social comparison, competitive toxicity, and a sense of obligation to play. The presence of microtransactions for gear upgrades raises concerns about pay-to-win dynamics. Content includes high levels of violence and potentially strong language.