Compare this game
Getting Over It with Bennett Foddy

Review · Action · iOS · Android · PC

Getting Over It with Bennett Foddy

Reviewed: 15 May 2026

iOS · Android · PC · macOS

Noodlecake Studios · 2017

Ludograph rating

B

Good

66 /100

06010030BenefitLow riskB 53 · R 13
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

53

Risk (RIS)

13

Daily limit

120min

Age guidance

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.78
B2Social-emotional
0.03
B3Motor
0.65

Getting Over It with Bennett Foddy challenges players with a unique and highly demanding climbing experience, fostering exceptional problem-solving, spatial awareness, strategic thinking, critical thinking, memory, and hand-eye coordination. The game's design encourages perseverance and adaptive learning as players repeatedly attempt to master its intricate physics and overcome frustrating setbacks. The philosophical narration adds an intellectual layer, engaging players in reflective thought while they navigate the arduous ascent.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.27
R2Monetization
0.00
R3Social risk
0.06

The game's core mechanic of losing all progress upon falling can lead to significant frustration and potential negative impacts on emotional regulation and self-worth for some players. While not employing typical compulsion-loop design tactics like variable rewards or FOMO, the constant 'near miss' scenarios and the escalating commitment required to progress can create a highly addictive loop. The absence of natural stopping points and the penalty of losing progress can make it difficult for players to disengage, potentially leading to extended, agonizing play sessions.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.00
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.00
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.00

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Regulatory design checks · DSAAssessed: meets criteria·GDPR-KAssessed: meets criteria·ODDSAssessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

Parents ask…

Is Getting Over It with Bennett Foddy safe for kids?

Ludograph gives Getting Over It with Bennett Foddy a rating of 66/100. It offers solid benefits but needs parental guidance on the risks.

How long should kids play Getting Over It with Bennett Foddy?

Our session recommendation for Getting Over It with Bennett Foddy is up to 120 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of Getting Over It with Bennett Foddy?

The game's core mechanic of losing all progress upon falling can lead to significant frustration and potential negative impacts on emotional regulation and self-worth for some players. While not employing typical compulsion-loop design tactics like variable rewards or FOMO, the constant 'near miss' scenarios and the escalating commitment required to progress can create a highly addictive loop. The