
Review · Simulation · PC
挂机修仙-宗门飞升
Reviewed: 23 Jun 2026
PC
The Fat Worker · 2025
Ludograph rating
Growth (BDS)
23
Risk (RIS)
27
Daily limit
90min
Age guidance
7+
Developmental benefits
| B1 | Cognitive | 0.42 | |
| B2 | Social-emotional | 0.00 | |
| B3 | Motor | 0.10 | |
This idle simulation game offers a relaxing experience of managing a cultivation sect, focusing on strategic resource allocation and long-term progression. Players can engage in various 'arts' like alchemy and artifact refining, promoting problem-solving and strategic thinking in a low-pressure environment.
Design risks
| R1 | Compulsion-loop pressure | 0.43 | |
| R2 | Monetization | 0.25 | |
| R3 | Social risk | 0.00 | |
The game's idle nature and microtransactions could lead to excessive engagement and potential spending. While not explicitly designed for manipulation, the continuous progression loop and potential for accelerated progress via purchases might encourage prolonged play and financial investment.
Content (not in risk score)
| R4.1 | Violence Level | 0.33 | |
| R4.2 | Sexual Content | 0.00 | |
| R4.3 | Language | 0.00 | |
| R4.4 | Substance References | 0.33 | |
| R4.5 | Fear / Horror | 0.00 | |
Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.
Heads up
- Monthly spendTypical real-money spend by engaged players: $5 – $50/mo.
Regulatory design checks · DSA — Not yet assessed·GDPR-K — Not yet assessed·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria
- DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.
- GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.
- ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.
These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.