Compare this game
hack_me

Review · Simulation · PC

hack_me

Reviewed: 23 May 2026

PC

Egor Magurin · 2017

Ludograph rating

B

Good

58 /100

Automated review
06010030Benefit →Low risk →B 41 · R 0
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

41

Risk (RIS)

0

Daily limit

120min

Age guidance

7+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.66
B2Social-emotional
0.03
B3Motor
0.35

Hack_me offers significant cognitive benefits, particularly in problem-solving, strategic thinking, and critical analysis as players engage with complex hacking challenges. The game's use of 'real ways and programs' also fosters learning transfer and systems thinking, making it an intellectually stimulating experience.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.00
R2Monetization
0.00
R3Social risk
0.00

The primary risk in Hack_me lies in its notable propaganda, promoting a specific worldview about cybersecurity and the vulnerability of systems. While the game lacks compulsion-loop design, monetization pressures, or social risks, its core message could influence players' perspectives on digital security and ethics.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.33
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.00
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.00

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

Avg playtime~3 hReviewedMay 2026Report a data error →How scores are calculated →

Parents ask…

Is hack_me safe for kids?

Ludograph gives hack_me a rating of 58/100, recommended for ages 7 and up. It offers solid benefits but needs parental guidance on the risks.

What age is hack_me appropriate for?

Ludograph's rubric recommends a minimum age of 7+ for hack_me, based on benefits, risks, and content review.

How long should kids play hack_me?

Our session recommendation for hack_me is up to 120 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of hack_me?

The primary risk in Hack_me lies in its notable propaganda, promoting a specific worldview about cybersecurity and the vulnerability of systems. While the game lacks compulsion-loop design, monetization pressures, or social risks, its core message could influence players' perspectives on digital security and ethics.