
Review · Fighting · PC
Hazard (itch) (Risky FNS)
Reviewed: 09 May 2026
PC
Risky FNS · 2022
Ludograph rating
B
Good
65 /100
Hazard provides a strategic board game adaptation, building strategic thinking and problem solving, with potential for competitive toxicity.
Growth (BDS)
53
Risk (RIS)
14
Daily limit
120min
Age guidance
13+
Developmental benefits
| B1 | Cognitive | 0.68 | |
| B2 | Social-emotional | 0.47 | |
| B3 | Motor | 0.25 | |
Hazard provides a digital adaptation of the classic board game Risk, emphasizing strategic planning, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. Players can develop spatial awareness and improve their understanding of game theory. The game encourages social interaction through peer bonding and cooperative play.
Design risks
| R1 | Compulsion-loop pressure | 0.17 | |
| R2 | Monetization | 0.00 | |
| R3 | Social risk | 0.28 | |
While primarily focused on strategic gameplay, Hazard does contain elements of competitive toxicity due to its direct player-versus-player nature. There are minor compulsion-loop design elements, such as variable rewards for successful conquests, but these are not highly exploitative. Violence is abstract and thematic, representing conflict on a world map.
Content (not in risk score)
| R4.1 | Violence Level | 0.67 | |
| R4.2 | Sexual Content | 0.00 | |
| R4.3 | Language | 0.00 | |
| R4.4 | Substance References | 0.00 | |
| R4.5 | Fear / Horror | 0.00 | |
Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.
Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria
- DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
- GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
- ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.
These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.