Compare this game
Hearts-by-Webfoot

Review · Board Games · iOS

Hearts-by-Webfoot

Reviewed: 13 May 2026

iOS

Webfoot Technologies · 2013

Ludograph rating

C

Mixed

55 /100

Hearts-by-Webfoot is a card game that builds problem solving and strategic thinking through classic Hearts gameplay.

06010030BenefitLow riskB 38 · R 1
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

38

Risk (RIS)

1

Daily limit

120min

Age guidance

13+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.60
B2Social-emotional
0.03
B3Motor
0.35

Hearts-by-Webfoot offers significant cognitive benefits, particularly in problem-solving, strategic and critical thinking, and memory. Players must plan their moves carefully, adapt to changing game states, and remember cards played by opponents. It also provides moderate benefits in math systems and learning transfer through understanding card game strategies. The game offers some development in hand-eye coordination and fine motor skills through touchscreen interaction.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.00
R2Monetization
0.00
R3Social risk
0.06

This game presents minimal risks. As a single-player experience against AI, there are no social risks from interactions with other players. There are no manipulative compulsion-loop mechanics, monetization pressures, or concerning content risks. The only minor risk is potential frustration from competitive play against the AI, which can contribute to a very low level of emotional dysregulation.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.00
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.00
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.00

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Regulatory design checks · DSAAssessed: meets criteria·GDPR-KAssessed: meets criteria·ODDSAssessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

Parents ask…

Is Hearts-by-Webfoot safe for kids?

Ludograph gives Hearts-by-Webfoot a rating of 55/100. It delivers genuine benefits but carries design risks that deserve a close look.

How long should kids play Hearts-by-Webfoot?

Our session recommendation for Hearts-by-Webfoot is up to 120 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of Hearts-by-Webfoot?

This game presents minimal risks. As a single-player experience against AI, there are no social risks from interactions with other players. There are no manipulative compulsion-loop mechanics, monetization pressures, or concerning content risks. The only minor risk is potential frustration from competitive play against the AI, which can contribute to a very low level of emotional dysregulation.