Review · RPG · iOS
High School Beauty Contest
Reviewed: 28 Jun 2026
iOS
Timothy Taggart · 2019
Ludograph rating
Growth (BDS)
11
Risk (RIS)
11
Daily limit
120min
Age guidance
9+
Developmental benefits
| B1 | Cognitive | 0.16 | |
| B2 | Social-emotional | 0.03 | |
| B3 | Motor | 0.10 | |
High School Beauty Contest encourages creativity and aesthetic judgment through outfit design and styling. It offers a light, engaging experience focused on self-expression within a fashion context.
Design risks
| R1 | Compulsion-loop pressure | 0.07 | |
| R2 | Monetization | 0.04 | |
| R3 | Social risk | 0.28 | |
The game's focus on beauty contests and external judgment may inadvertently promote social comparison and could impact a player's self-worth by emphasizing conventional beauty standards. While not explicitly manipulative, the 'judges review' mechanic could create a mild sense of variable reward.
Content (not in risk score)
| R4.1 | Violence Level | 0.00 | |
| R4.2 | Sexual Content | 0.33 | |
| R4.3 | Language | 0.00 | |
| R4.4 | Substance References | 0.00 | |
| R4.5 | Fear / Horror | 0.00 | |
Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.
Regulatory design checks · DSA — Not yet assessed·GDPR-K — Not yet assessed·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria
- DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.
- GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.
- ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.
These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.