
Review · Simulation · Nintendo DS
Imagine: Fashion Designer New York
Reviewed: 31 May 2026
Nintendo DS
Ubisoft · 2008
Ludograph rating
Growth (BDS)
35
Risk (RIS)
3
Daily limit
120min
Age guidance
–
Developmental benefits
| B1 | Cognitive | 0.52 | |
| B2 | Social-emotional | 0.10 | |
| B3 | Motor | 0.30 | |
Imagine: Fashion Designer New York fosters creativity and self-expression through engaging design challenges. Players develop spatial awareness, strategic thinking, and problem-solving skills as they craft unique outfits and manage fashion shows. The game provides a positive outlet for artistic exploration.
Design risks
| R1 | Compulsion-loop pressure | 0.00 | |
| R2 | Monetization | 0.00 | |
| R3 | Social risk | 0.11 | |
This game presents minimal risks, with no manipulative monetization or social pressures. Content is appropriate for all ages. The primary risk is potential for excessive screen time, as creative endeavors can be engrossing, but the game design itself does not employ manipulative tactics to extend play.
Content (not in risk score)
| R4.1 | Violence Level | 0.00 | |
| R4.2 | Sexual Content | 0.00 | |
| R4.3 | Language | 0.00 | |
| R4.4 | Substance References | 0.00 | |
| R4.5 | Fear / Horror | 0.00 | |
Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.
Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria
- DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
- GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
- ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.
These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.