Review · Action · PlayStation 3
inFAMOUS 2
Reviewed: 01 May 2026
PlayStation 3
Sucker Punch Productions · 2011
Ludograph rating
B
Good
59 /100
inFAMOUS 2 is an action-adventure game encouraging creativity and problem solving through its open world and strategic decisions, though it contains moderate violence.
Growth (BDS)
42
Risk (RIS)
1
Daily limit
–
Age guidance
17+
Developmental benefits
| B1 | Cognitive | 0.58 | |
| B2 | Social-emotional | 0.13 | |
| B3 | Motor | 0.45 | |
inFAMOUS 2 offers a rich cognitive experience through its open-world problem-solving, strategic combat, and critical decision-making via the Karma system. Players can express significant creativity by designing and sharing their own levels. The game also fosters ethical reasoning through its morality choices and provides opportunities for learning and adapting new superpowers.
Design risks
| R1 | Compulsion-loop pressure | 0.00 | |
| R2 | Monetization | 0.00 | |
| R3 | Social risk | 0.06 | |
The primary risk in inFAMOUS 2 is its moderate level of violence, consistent with its 'Teen' ESRB rating. While the game does not feature manipulative monetization or reward-driven mechanics, the user-generated content feature could subtly introduce social comparison among players.
Content (not in risk score)
| R4.1 | Violence Level | 1.00 | |
| R4.2 | Sexual Content | 0.00 | |
| R4.3 | Language | 0.33 | |
| R4.4 | Substance References | 0.00 | |
| R4.5 | Fear / Horror | 0.00 | |
Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.
Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria
- DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
- GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
- ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.
These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.