Compare this game
Lovers in a Dangerous Spacetime

Review · Action · Xbox One · Nintendo Switch · PlayStation 4

Lovers in a Dangerous Spacetime

Reviewed: 01 May 2026

Xbox One · Nintendo Switch · PlayStation 4 · PC · macOS · Linux

Asteroid Base · 2015

Ludograph rating

A

Recommended

69 /100

Automated review

Lovers in a Dangerous Spacetime is a cooperative action game that builds spatial awareness, teamwork, and communication through shared objectives.

06010030Benefit →Low risk →B 53 · R 0
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

53

Risk (RIS)

0

Daily limit

120min

Age guidance

7+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.52
B2Social-emotional
0.60
B3Motor
0.45

Lovers in a Dangerous Spacetime is a cooperative action game that excels in fostering teamwork and communication. Players must constantly coordinate and move around their spaceship to manage different systems, promoting spatial awareness, strategic thinking, and problem-solving skills. The game's emphasis on cooperation makes it a valuable experience for developing social-emotional competencies.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.00
R2Monetization
0.00
R3Social risk
0.00

The primary risk in Lovers in a Dangerous Spacetime is the mild cartoon violence inherent in a space shooter. Players destroy enemy ships and monsters, but the 'superflat' art style and bright colors minimize any graphic or realistic depictions of violence. There are no monetization pressures, social risks, or compulsion-loop design mechanics present.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.33
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.00
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.00

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

Avg playtime~3 hReviewedMay 2026Report a data error →How scores are calculated →

Parents ask…

Is Lovers in a Dangerous Spacetime safe for kids?

Ludograph gives Lovers in a Dangerous Spacetime a rating of 69/100, recommended for ages 7 and up. It scores well on developmental benefits with manageable risks.

What age is Lovers in a Dangerous Spacetime appropriate for?

Ludograph's rubric recommends a minimum age of 7+ for Lovers in a Dangerous Spacetime, based on benefits, risks, and content review.

How long should kids play Lovers in a Dangerous Spacetime?

Our session recommendation for Lovers in a Dangerous Spacetime is up to 120 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of Lovers in a Dangerous Spacetime?

The primary risk in Lovers in a Dangerous Spacetime is the mild cartoon violence inherent in a space shooter. Players destroy enemy ships and monsters, but the 'superflat' art style and bright colors minimize any graphic or realistic depictions of violence. There are no monetization pressures, social risks, or compulsion-loop design mechanics present.