Review · Strategy · PC · Xbox 360 · PlayStation 3
Magic: The Gathering 2014 — Duels of the Planeswalkers
Reviewed: 01 May 2026
PC · Xbox 360 · PlayStation 3
Stainless Games · 2013
Ludograph rating
B
Good
66 /100
Magic: The Gathering 2014 — Duels of the Planeswalkers is a card game that builds strategic thinking and problem-solving skills through complex combat and deck-building.
Growth (BDS)
56
Risk (RIS)
20
Daily limit
90min
Age guidance
13+
Developmental benefits
| B1 | Cognitive | 0.82 | |
| B2 | Social-emotional | 0.43 | |
| B3 | Motor | 0.10 | |
Magic: The Gathering 2014 — Duels of the Planeswalkers offers a rich strategic experience, fostering critical thinking, problem-solving, and memory skills through complex deck-building and tactical combat. Players can engage in cooperative multiplayer, promoting teamwork and communication, while also enjoying creative expression through personalized decks. The game provides a structured learning environment with tutorials and challenges, encouraging adaptive learning.
Design risks
| R1 | Compulsion-loop pressure | 0.27 | |
| R2 | Monetization | 0.00 | |
| R3 | Social risk | 0.33 | |
While largely free from monetization and social risks, the competitive nature of Magic: The Gathering can expose players to mild competitive toxicity and social comparison. The fantasy violence and mild language, typical of a 'Teen' rated game, are present but not graphic. Some elements of variable rewards from unlocking cards could be mildly engaging but are not designed to be highly manipulative.
Content (not in risk score)
| R4.1 | Violence Level | 0.67 | |
| R4.2 | Sexual Content | 0.00 | |
| R4.3 | Language | 0.33 | |
| R4.4 | Substance References | 0.00 | |
| R4.5 | Fear / Horror | 0.33 | |
Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.
Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria
- DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
- GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
- ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.
These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.