Compare this game
Mole or Not

Review · Strategy · PC

Mole or Not

Reviewed: 19 Jun 2026

PC

Ey Games · 2025

Ludograph rating

A

Recommended

69 /100

Automated review
06010030Benefit →Low risk →B 53 · R 3
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

53

Risk (RIS)

3

Daily limit

120min

Age guidance

–

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.68
B2Social-emotional
0.63
B3Motor
0.00

Mole or Not is a highly engaging social deduction game that significantly boosts cognitive skills such as problem-solving, strategic thinking, critical analysis, and creativity. Its core mechanics revolve around communication and emotional regulation, fostering positive social interactions and lively discussions among players. The game encourages players to think on their feet, adapt to changing situations, and understand different perspectives.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.00
R2Monetization
0.00
R3Social risk
0.11

The primary risks associated with Mole or Not are minimal, mainly stemming from the inherent competitive nature of social deduction games, which could lead to mild social obligation or competitive toxicity. However, the absence of stranger chat significantly mitigates social risks. The game presents no significant compulsion-loop design, monetization pressures, or concerning content risks.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.00
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.00
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.00

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

ReviewedJun 2026Report a data error →How scores are calculated →

Parents ask…

Is Mole or Not safe for kids?

Ludograph gives Mole or Not a rating of 69/100. It scores well on developmental benefits with manageable risks.

How long should kids play Mole or Not?

Our session recommendation for Mole or Not is up to 120 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of Mole or Not?

The primary risks associated with Mole or Not are minimal, mainly stemming from the inherent competitive nature of social deduction games, which could lead to mild social obligation or competitive toxicity. However, the absence of stranger chat significantly mitigates social risks. The game presents no significant compulsion-loop design, monetization pressures, or concerning content risks.