Compare this game
MouseCraft

Review · Action · PS Vita · PlayStation 4 · PlayStation 3

MouseCraft

Reviewed: 01 May 2026

PS Vita · PlayStation 4 · PlayStation 3 · Nintendo Switch · PC · Linux · macOS

Curve Digital · 2014

Ludograph rating

B

Good

59 /100

Automated review

MouseCraft is a puzzle game that helps develop problem-solving and spatial awareness by guiding mice through levels.

06010030Benefit →Low risk →B 43 · R 6
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

43

Risk (RIS)

6

Daily limit

120min

Age guidance

7+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.68
B2Social-emotional
0.07
B3Motor
0.35

MouseCraft offers a unique blend of puzzle-solving and spatial reasoning, challenging players to strategically place Tetromino bricks to guide mice through 80 handcrafted levels. The game fosters critical thinking and problem-solving skills, with an added layer of creativity through its level editor. Its engaging mechanics and flexible session lengths make it an accessible and rewarding experience for players of all ages.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.07
R2Monetization
0.00
R3Social risk
0.11

While MouseCraft is largely free of significant risks, the presence of leaderboards could introduce a minor element of social comparison. The game also features mild cartoon violence, such as blowing up objects and encountering enemies, which is typical for a puzzle game of this nature. However, it lacks any manipulative design mechanics, monetization pressures, or social risks associated with online interactions.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.33
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.00
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.00

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

Avg playtime~3 hReviewedMay 2026Report a data error →How scores are calculated →

Parents ask…

Is MouseCraft safe for kids?

Ludograph gives MouseCraft a rating of 59/100, recommended for ages 7 and up. It offers solid benefits but needs parental guidance on the risks.

What age is MouseCraft appropriate for?

Ludograph's rubric recommends a minimum age of 7+ for MouseCraft, based on benefits, risks, and content review.

How long should kids play MouseCraft?

Our session recommendation for MouseCraft is up to 120 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of MouseCraft?

While MouseCraft is largely free of significant risks, the presence of leaderboards could introduce a minor element of social comparison. The game also features mild cartoon violence, such as blowing up objects and encountering enemies, which is typical for a puzzle game of this nature. However, it lacks any manipulative design mechanics, monetization pressures, or social risks associated with onl