Compare this game
No.Draw – Colors by Number

Review · Board Games · iOS

No.Draw – Colors by Number

Reviewed: 30 Jun 2026

iOS

EYEWIND · 2017

Ludograph rating

E

Avoid

25 /100

06010030BenefitLow riskB 16 · R 39
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

16

Risk (RIS)

39

Daily limit

30min

Age guidance

10+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.14
B2Social-emotional
0.10
B3Motor
0.30

No.Draw – Colors by Number offers cognitive benefits for children, enhancing hand-eye coordination, focus, and recognition of colors and numbers. It also provides a relaxing and stress-relieving 'color therapy' experience for adults, fostering a sense of accomplishment through completing pixel art.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.47
R2Monetization
0.54
R3Social risk
0.06

The game employs significant monetization pressure, particularly targeting children with ads and subscriptions. It uses compulsion-loop design tactics such as daily content updates and artificial barriers (limited tools for free users, rewarded videos) to encourage continuous engagement and spending. The subscription model, especially the weekly option, can lead to high recurring costs.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.00
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.00
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.00

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Heads up

  • Monthly spendTypical real-money spend by engaged players: $0 – $15/mo.

Regulatory design checks · DSAAssessed: concerns noted·GDPR-KAssessed: concerns noted·ODDSAssessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. Likely violations: monetisation that deliberately targets children; frequent spending prompts in a children-rated game.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. Likely violations: profiling or targeting of children for marketing.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

Parents ask…

Is No.Draw – Colors by Number safe for kids?

Ludograph gives No.Draw – Colors by Number a rating of 25/100. Significant risks make this hard to recommend for younger players.

How long should kids play No.Draw – Colors by Number?

Our session recommendation for No.Draw – Colors by Number is up to 30 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of No.Draw – Colors by Number?

The game employs significant monetization pressure, particularly targeting children with ads and subscriptions. It uses compulsion-loop design tactics such as daily content updates and artificial barriers (limited tools for free users, rewarded videos) to encourage continuous engagement and spending. The subscription model, especially the weekly option, can lead to high recurring costs.