Compare this game
Rainbow Billy: The Curse of the Leviathan

Review · Adventure · PC · PlayStation 4 · Xbox One

Rainbow Billy: The Curse of the Leviathan

Reviewed: 18 May 2026

PC · PlayStation 4 · Xbox One · Nintendo Switch

ManaVoid Entertainment · 2021

Ludograph rating

B

Good

66 /100

06010030BenefitLow riskB 49 · R 0
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

49

Risk (RIS)

0

Daily limit

120min

Age guidance

7+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.64
B2Social-emotional
0.33
B3Motor
0.35

Rainbow Billy: The Curse of the Leviathan offers significant cognitive benefits through its intricate color puzzles, strategic team-building, and exploration. Players will engage their problem-solving, critical thinking, and strategic planning skills. The game also fosters social-emotional development by encouraging empathy through befriending creatures and promoting positive social themes of friendship. Motor skills, particularly hand-eye coordination and reaction time, are moderately engaged through its platforming and combat elements.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.00
R2Monetization
0.00
R3Social risk
0.00

This game presents very low risks across all categories. There are no compulsion-loop design mechanics, monetization pressures, or social interaction risks such as stranger chat or competitive toxicity. Content risks are minimal, with only mild cartoon violence appropriate for its E-rating.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.33
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.00
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.00

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Regulatory design checks · DSAAssessed: meets criteria·GDPR-KAssessed: meets criteria·ODDSAssessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

Parents ask…

Is Rainbow Billy: The Curse of the Leviathan safe for kids?

Ludograph gives Rainbow Billy: The Curse of the Leviathan a rating of 66/100, recommended for ages 7 and up. It offers solid benefits but needs parental guidance on the risks.

What age is Rainbow Billy: The Curse of the Leviathan appropriate for?

Ludograph's rubric recommends a minimum age of 7+ for Rainbow Billy: The Curse of the Leviathan, based on benefits, risks, and content review. That is stricter than ESRB E, because our assessment weighs behavioral design risks, not just content.

How long should kids play Rainbow Billy: The Curse of the Leviathan?

Our session recommendation for Rainbow Billy: The Curse of the Leviathan is up to 120 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of Rainbow Billy: The Curse of the Leviathan?

This game presents very low risks across all categories. There are no compulsion-loop design mechanics, monetization pressures, or social interaction risks such as stranger chat or competitive toxicity. Content risks are minimal, with only mild cartoon violence appropriate for its E-rating.