Review · Action · PC
SCP: Containment Breach
Reviewed: 30 Apr 2026
PC
Regalis · 2012
Ludograph rating
B
Good
65 /100
SCP: Containment Breach is an action game that promotes problem solving and strategic thinking, but features intense horror and violence.
Growth (BDS)
48
Risk (RIS)
0
Daily limit
–
Age guidance
17+
Developmental benefits
| B1 | Cognitive | 0.78 | |
| B2 | Social-emotional | 0.00 | |
| B3 | Motor | 0.45 | |
SCP: Containment Breach offers a deeply immersive and challenging horror experience that heavily relies on problem-solving, critical thinking, and spatial awareness to survive. Players must learn patterns, manage resources, and adapt to unpredictable threats, fostering significant cognitive engagement. The game also demands strong memory and attention to detail to navigate complex environments and avoid dangers.
Design risks
| R1 | Compulsion-loop pressure | 0.00 | |
| R2 | Monetization | 0.00 | |
| R3 | Social risk | 0.00 | |
The primary risks in SCP: Containment Breach stem from its intense horror content, including high levels of fear and horror, violence, and some language. The game's atmosphere and themes are not suitable for young or sensitive players. There are no social or monetization risks as it is a single-player, free game.
Content (not in risk score)
| R4.1 | Violence Level | 1.00 | |
| R4.2 | Sexual Content | 0.00 | |
| R4.3 | Language | 0.67 | |
| R4.4 | Substance References | 0.33 | |
| R4.5 | Fear / Horror | 1.00 | |
Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.
Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria
- DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
- GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
- ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.
These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.