Compare this game
Soccer 2017 Games - Real Matches of Striker player

Review · Simulation · iOS

Soccer 2017 Games - Real Matches of Striker player

Reviewed: 01 May 2026

iOS

hamza khalid · 2015

Ludograph rating

D

Caution

38 /100

Soccer 2017 Games - Real Matches of Striker player is a soccer simulation that builds problem-solving, spatial awareness, and strategic thinking.

06010030BenefitLow riskB 24 · R 7
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

24

Risk (RIS)

7

Daily limit

120min

Age guidance

10+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.30
B2Social-emotional
0.00
B3Motor
0.45

Soccer 2017 Games offers a straightforward soccer simulation experience that can help develop problem-solving, spatial awareness, and strategic thinking skills through its various difficulty levels and game modes. The game encourages hand-eye coordination, fine motor skills, and reaction time, which are beneficial for physical development. Players can enjoy practicing soccer skills and competing against AI or on global leaderboards.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.07
R2Monetization
0.00
R3Social risk
0.17

While Soccer 2017 Games does not have significant monetary or content risks, it does have a competitive aspect that could foster competitive toxicity through global leaderboards. The game includes basic compulsion-loop design through variable rewards and infinite play, which could encourage prolonged engagement, though it has natural stopping points with match and tournament endings. Privacy risks are present due to sharing achievements on Facebook and competing on a global leaderboard.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.00
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.00
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.00

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Regulatory design checks · DSAAssessed: meets criteria·GDPR-KNot yet assessed·ODDSAssessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

Parents ask…

Is Soccer 2017 Games - Real Matches of Striker player safe for kids?

Ludograph gives Soccer 2017 Games - Real Matches of Striker player a rating of 38/100. There are notable risks worth knowing before letting kids play.

How long should kids play Soccer 2017 Games - Real Matches of Striker player?

Our session recommendation for Soccer 2017 Games - Real Matches of Striker player is up to 120 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of Soccer 2017 Games - Real Matches of Striker player?

While Soccer 2017 Games does not have significant monetary or content risks, it does have a competitive aspect that could foster competitive toxicity through global leaderboards. The game includes basic compulsion-loop design through variable rewards and infinite play, which could encourage prolonged engagement, though it has natural stopping points with match and tournament endings. Privacy risks