Compare this game
SolForge

Review · RPG · Linux · macOS · iOS

SolForge

Reviewed: 20 May 2026

Linux · macOS · iOS · PC

Stone Blade Entertainment · 2012

Ludograph rating

C

Mixed

51 /100

Automated review
06010030Benefit →Low risk →B 41 · R 31
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

41

Risk (RIS)

31

Daily limit

60min

Age guidance

7+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.70
B2Social-emotional
0.10
B3Motor
0.15

SolForge offers significant cognitive benefits through its strategic deck construction, unique card leveling mechanic, and challenging gameplay. Players will engage in problem-solving, critical thinking, and adaptive strategy as they learn to master the game's complex interactions and customize their decks. The 'simple to learn, difficult to master' design fosters continuous learning and skill development.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.37
R2Monetization
0.25
R3Social risk
0.28

As a free-to-play collectible card game with microtransactions, SolForge presents moderate risks related to monetization pressure and compulsion-loop design. The ability to purchase cards and the presence of regular events may encourage spending and consistent engagement. The competitive online environment, including ranked play and tournaments, could also lead to social comparison and competitive toxicity.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.33
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.00
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.00

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Heads up

  • Monthly spendTypical real-money spend by engaged players: $0 – $20/mo.

Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: concerns noted·GDPR-K — Not yet assessed·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. Likely violations: frequent spending prompts in a children-rated game.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

Avg playtime~1 hReviewedMay 2026Report a data error →How scores are calculated →

Parents ask…

Is SolForge safe for kids?

Ludograph gives SolForge a rating of 51/100, recommended for ages 7 and up. It delivers genuine benefits but carries design risks that deserve a close look.

What age is SolForge appropriate for?

Ludograph's rubric recommends a minimum age of 7+ for SolForge, based on benefits, risks, and content review. That is more lenient than ESRB E10+: industry ratings reflect content intensity, while ours also weighs how the game is designed to be played.

How long should kids play SolForge?

Our session recommendation for SolForge is up to 60 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of SolForge?

As a free-to-play collectible card game with microtransactions, SolForge presents moderate risks related to monetization pressure and compulsion-loop design. The ability to purchase cards and the presence of regular events may encourage spending and consistent engagement. The competitive online environment, including ranked play and tournaments, could also lead to social comparison and competitive