Review · Fighting · PC
Super 19th Century Philosophers 64
Reviewed: 09 May 2026
PC
Pzsz · 2022
Ludograph rating
C
Mixed
51 /100
Super 19th Century Philosophers 64 is a rogue-like fighting game that enhances hand-eye coordination, reaction time, and problem solving, but features high levels of violence.
Growth (BDS)
35
Risk (RIS)
5
Daily limit
–
Age guidance
17+
Developmental benefits
| B1 | Cognitive | 0.44 | |
| B2 | Social-emotional | 0.00 | |
| B3 | Motor | 0.65 | |
Super 19th Century Philosophers 64 offers a challenging rogue-like experience that can enhance hand-eye coordination, reaction time, and strategic thinking. Players will need to adapt and learn from each run to progress, fostering adaptive challenge and learning transfer.
Design risks
| R1 | Compulsion-loop pressure | 0.10 | |
| R2 | Monetization | 0.00 | |
| R3 | Social risk | 0.00 | |
The game features high levels of violence, with the player character fighting hordes of enemies. Additionally, the game has a strong propagandistic element with its clear anti-bourgeoisie theme, which may expose players to biased political messaging. While there are no direct monetization risks or social interaction risks, the focus on continuous combat and character progression could encourage extended play sessions.
Content (not in risk score)
| R4.1 | Violence Level | 1.00 | |
| R4.2 | Sexual Content | 0.00 | |
| R4.3 | Language | 0.00 | |
| R4.4 | Substance References | 0.00 | |
| R4.5 | Fear / Horror | 0.00 | |
Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.
Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria
- DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
- GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
- ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.
These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.