
Review · Action · PC · Android · macOS
Tasty Blue
Reviewed: 25 May 2026
PC · Android · macOS · iOS
Dingo Games · 2014
Ludograph rating
Growth (BDS)
52
Risk (RIS)
6
Daily limit
120min
Age guidance
13+
Developmental benefits
| B1 | Cognitive | 0.54 | |
| B2 | Social-emotional | 0.40 | |
| B3 | Motor | 0.65 | |
Tasty Blue offers engaging gameplay where players grow by eating, fostering spatial awareness, strategic thinking, and hand-eye coordination. The local co-op mode encourages teamwork and communication. The game provides a sense of progression and achievement through its level-based structure and increasing difficulty.
Design risks
| R1 | Compulsion-loop pressure | 0.10 | |
| R2 | Monetization | 0.04 | |
| R3 | Social risk | 0.00 | |
While generally low-risk, the game features mild violence with an optional 'carnage mode' that displays blood. The core mechanic of constant eating and growth could be mildly engaging in a compulsion-loop fashion, but without manipulative monetization or social mechanics, these risks are minimal.
Content (not in risk score)
| R4.1 | Violence Level | 0.67 | |
| R4.2 | Sexual Content | 0.00 | |
| R4.3 | Language | 0.00 | |
| R4.4 | Substance References | 0.00 | |
| R4.5 | Fear / Horror | 0.00 | |
Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.
Regulatory design checks · DSA — Not yet assessed·GDPR-K — Not yet assessed·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria
- DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.
- GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.
- ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.
These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.