Compare this game
to the

Review · Adventure · PC

to the

Reviewed: 01 Jul 2026

PC

露椿 · 2025

Ludograph rating

B

Good

59 /100

06010030BenefitLow riskB 44 · R 12
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

44

Risk (RIS)

12

Daily limit

120min

Age guidance

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.74
B2Social-emotional
0.17
B3Motor
0.10

to the is a unique philosophical adventure that deeply engages players in critical thinking, memory, and strategic decision-making. Its core mechanics challenge players to reflect on their choices and values, fostering intellectual growth and self-awareness through its thought-provoking dilemmas and adaptive challenges.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.27
R2Monetization
0.00
R3Social risk
0.00

The game presents minimal risks related to compulsion-loop design, monetization, social interaction, or content. The primary "risks" are intellectual, as players might find the philosophical nature challenging or the memory mechanic frustrating if they struggle with it. However, these are inherent to the game's design and not manipulative.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.00
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.00
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.00

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Regulatory design checks · DSAAssessed: meets criteria·GDPR-KAssessed: meets criteria·ODDSAssessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

Parents ask…

Is to the safe for kids?

Ludograph gives to the a rating of 59/100. It offers solid benefits but needs parental guidance on the risks.

How long should kids play to the?

Our session recommendation for to the is up to 120 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of to the?

The game presents minimal risks related to compulsion-loop design, monetization, social interaction, or content. The primary "risks" are intellectual, as players might find the philosophical nature challenging or the memory mechanic frustrating if they struggle with it. However, these are inherent to the game's design and not manipulative.