Compare this game
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Rogue Spear

Review · Action · PC · Game Boy Advance · PlayStation

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Rogue Spear

Reviewed: 01 May 2026

PC · Game Boy Advance · PlayStation · Classic Macintosh · Dreamcast

Red Storm · 1999

Ludograph rating

A

Recommended

77 /100

Automated review

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Rogue Spear is a strategic shooter that develops problem solving and spatial awareness, but its M rating indicates mature content.

06010030Benefit →Low risk →B 64 · R 4
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

64

Risk (RIS)

4

Daily limit

–

Age guidance

17+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.66
B2Social-emotional
0.60
B3Motor
0.65

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Rogue Spear is a highly strategic and team-oriented shooter that demands significant problem-solving, spatial awareness, and critical thinking. Players must coordinate with AI teammates, plan their approach carefully, and react quickly to dynamic situations. The game fosters a sense of accomplishment through mastering complex tactical challenges.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.07
R2Monetization
0.00
R3Social risk
0.06

The primary risks in Rogue Spear stem from its mature content, including realistic violence and some strong language. While the game emphasizes strategic thinking over gratuitous violence, the themes of terrorism and combat might be intense for younger players. There are also minor risks associated with competitive gameplay, such as potential toxicity, and the reinforcement of geopolitical stereotypes through its narrative.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
1.00
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.33
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.33

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

Avg playtime~60 hReviewedMay 2026Report a data error →How scores are calculated →

Parents ask…

Is Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Rogue Spear safe for kids?

Ludograph gives Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Rogue Spear a rating of 77/100, recommended for ages 17 and up. It scores well on developmental benefits with manageable risks.

What age is Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Rogue Spear appropriate for?

Ludograph's rubric recommends a minimum age of 17+ for Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Rogue Spear, based on benefits, risks, and content review. That is stricter than ESRB T, because our assessment weighs behavioral design risks, not just content.

How long should kids play Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Rogue Spear?

We don't publish a daily session budget for Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Rogue Spear: its design-risk score sits in our highest band, where limiting time alone doesn't address the risks. For children we suggest choosing an alternative instead.

What are the main risks of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Rogue Spear?

The primary risks in Rogue Spear stem from its mature content, including realistic violence and some strong language. While the game emphasizes strategic thinking over gratuitous violence, the themes of terrorism and combat might be intense for younger players. There are also minor risks associated with competitive gameplay, such as potential toxicity, and the reinforcement of geopolitical stereot