Review · RPG · PC
UBAI: To Take Another Man's Property
Reviewed: 13 Jun 2026
PC
STUDIO UBAI · 2025
Ludograph rating
Growth (BDS)
22
Risk (RIS)
0
Daily limit
–
Age guidance
17+
Developmental benefits
| B1 | Cognitive | 0.28 | |
| B2 | Social-emotional | 0.20 | |
| B3 | Motor | 0.10 | |
UBAI: To Take Another Man's Property offers a compelling narrative experience, engaging players in ethical reasoning and critical thinking as they navigate complex choices with two female protagonists. The focus on reading and language skills is a core benefit of the visual novel format.
Design risks
| R1 | Compulsion-loop pressure | 0.00 | |
| R2 | Monetization | 0.00 | |
| R3 | Social risk | 0.00 | |
The game contains mature content, including sexual themes, mature language, and references to illicit activities like stealing, which may not be suitable for younger audiences. While it explores ethical dilemmas, the content itself carries a risk for sensitive players.
Content (not in risk score)
| R4.1 | Violence Level | 0.33 | |
| R4.2 | Sexual Content | 1.00 | |
| R4.3 | Language | 0.67 | |
| R4.4 | Substance References | 0.33 | |
| R4.5 | Fear / Horror | 0.33 | |
Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.
Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria
- DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
- GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
- ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.
These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.