Review · Casual · Linux · PC
UMAMI
Reviewed: 01 Jul 2026
Linux · PC
Mimmox · 2025
Ludograph rating
Growth (BDS)
28
Risk (RIS)
2
Daily limit
120min
Age guidance
–
Developmental benefits
| B1 | Cognitive | 0.34 | |
| B2 | Social-emotional | 0.17 | |
| B3 | Motor | 0.30 | |
UMAMI offers significant cognitive benefits through its 3D puzzle-solving mechanics, enhancing spatial awareness, problem-solving skills, and gentle strategic thinking. Its stress-free design promotes emotional regulation and a sense of calm, making it a soothing experience.
Design risks
| R1 | Compulsion-loop pressure | 0.03 | |
| R2 | Monetization | 0.00 | |
| R3 | Social risk | 0.00 | |
This game presents extremely low risks across all categories. It contains no manipulative compulsion loops, monetization pressures, or social risks. Content is entirely wholesome with no violence, sexual themes, or harsh language. Its design actively avoids stress and pressure.
Content (not in risk score)
| R4.1 | Violence Level | 0.00 | |
| R4.2 | Sexual Content | 0.00 | |
| R4.3 | Language | 0.00 | |
| R4.4 | Substance References | 0.00 | |
| R4.5 | Fear / Horror | 0.00 | |
Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.
Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria
- DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
- GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
- ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.
These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.