Review · RPG · PC
鸭王-0.1专服版
Reviewed: 27 Jun 2026
PC
强盛集团 · 2024
Ludograph rating
Growth (BDS)
19
Risk (RIS)
54
Daily limit
15min
Age guidance
7+
Developmental benefits
| B1 | Cognitive | 0.28 | |
| B2 | Social-emotional | 0.07 | |
| B3 | Motor | 0.15 | |
《鸭王》 offers a casual and engaging experience centered around nurturing and developing your own duck. Players can enjoy the satisfaction of feeding their duck, acquiring new equipment, and seeing their duck grow in strength. The game also includes elements of exploration, challenging various creatures, and even managing a virtual company, fostering strategic thinking and a sense of accomplishment.
Design risks
| R1 | Compulsion-loop pressure | 0.67 | |
| R2 | Monetization | 0.58 | |
| R3 | Social risk | 0.28 | |
While offering engaging gameplay, 《鸭王》 employs several design mechanics that can encourage excessive play and spending. The game heavily relies on variable rewards for equipment and challenges, creating a strong incentive to continue playing. Time-gating mechanics, coupled with 'accelerator' items, can pressure players to either wait or spend money to progress. The presence of 'VIP' codes and multiple in-game currencies suggests a pay-to-win model, where spending can significantly enhance a player's duck and progression. The 'elite leaderboard' and 'king' title can also foster social comparison and tie into a player's self-worth, potentially leading to competitive pressure.
Content (not in risk score)
| R4.1 | Violence Level | 0.33 | |
| R4.2 | Sexual Content | 0.00 | |
| R4.3 | Language | 0.00 | |
| R4.4 | Substance References | 0.00 | |
| R4.5 | Fear / Horror | 0.00 | |
Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.
Heads up
- Monthly spendTypical real-money spend by engaged players: $5 – $100/mo.
Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: concerns noted·GDPR-K — Assessed: concerns noted·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria
- DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. Likely violations: monetisation that deliberately targets children; virtual currency that obscures real-money prices.
- GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. Likely violations: profiling or targeting of children for marketing.
- ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.
These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.