Compare this game
Call of Duty

Review · Shooter · PlayStation 3 · Xbox 360 · macOS

Call of Duty

Reviewed: 30 Apr 2026

PlayStation 3 · Xbox 360 · macOS · PC

Infinity Ward · 2003

Ludograph rating

C

Mixed

50 /100

Call of Duty is a historical first-person shooter that builds problem-solving and reaction time, though its mature content may be intense for some players.

06010030BenefitLow riskB 37 · R 25
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

37

Risk (RIS)

25

Daily limit

Age guidance

17+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.38
B2Social-emotional
0.17
B3Motor
0.65

Call of Duty (2003) offers a historical first-person shooter experience that can enhance problem-solving, spatial awareness, strategic thinking, and reaction time. Players engage in tactical combat scenarios, requiring quick decisions and coordinated actions in multiplayer modes. The game also provides a basic understanding of World War II settings and events through its campaign.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.17
R2Monetization
0.00
R3Social risk
0.22

The game contains significant violence and depicts wartime scenarios which may be intense for some players. While it lacks modern monetization tactics like loot boxes or subscriptions, it can still encourage competitive toxicity in multiplayer. The historical narrative, while educational, can also present a romanticized view of war, potentially downplaying its true horrors.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
1.00
R4.2Sexual Content
0.00
R4.3Language
0.33
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.67

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Regulatory design checks · DSAAssessed: meets criteria·GDPR-KAssessed: meets criteria·ODDSAssessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

Parents ask…

Is Call of Duty safe for kids?

Ludograph gives Call of Duty a rating of 50/100, recommended for ages 17 and up. It delivers genuine benefits but carries design risks that deserve a close look.

What age is Call of Duty appropriate for?

Ludograph's rubric recommends a minimum age of 17+ for Call of Duty, based on benefits, risks, and content review. That is stricter than ESRB T, because our assessment weighs behavioral design risks, not just content.

How long should kids play Call of Duty?

We don't publish a daily session budget for Call of Duty: its design-risk score sits in our highest band, where limiting time alone doesn't address the risks. For children we suggest choosing an alternative instead.

What are the main risks of Call of Duty?

The game contains significant violence and depicts wartime scenarios which may be intense for some players. While it lacks modern monetization tactics like loot boxes or subscriptions, it can still encourage competitive toxicity in multiplayer. The historical narrative, while educational, can also present a romanticized view of war, potentially downplaying its true horrors.