Review · Simulation · PC
ClosR
Reviewed: 22 Jun 2026
PC
Vue · 2026
Ludograph rating
Growth (BDS)
36
Risk (RIS)
23
Daily limit
90min
Age guidance
–
Developmental benefits
| B1 | Cognitive | 0.66 | |
| B2 | Social-emotional | 0.00 | |
| B3 | Motor | 0.15 | |
ClosR fosters strategic thinking, problem-solving, and mathematical reasoning through its complex economic optimization and risk management. Its adaptive challenges keep players engaged and learning.
Design risks
| R1 | Compulsion-loop pressure | 0.50 | |
| R2 | Monetization | 0.00 | |
| R3 | Social risk | 0.00 | |
ClosR's idle game design, with its continuous progression, variable rewards, and escalating commitment, can make it difficult to disengage, potentially leading to excessive playtime. The lack of natural stopping points and potential for notifications can create a constant pull for attention.
Content (not in risk score)
| R4.1 | Violence Level | 0.00 | |
| R4.2 | Sexual Content | 0.00 | |
| R4.3 | Language | 0.00 | |
| R4.4 | Substance References | 0.00 | |
| R4.5 | Fear / Horror | 0.00 | |
Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.
Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria
- DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
- GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
- ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.
These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.