Compare this game
good

Review · Adventure · PC

good

Reviewed: 20 Jun 2026

PC

zzox · 2025

Ludograph rating

C

Mixed

49 /100

Automated review
06010030Benefit →Low risk →B 33 · R 5
The Ludograph reading, plotted from the published benefit and risk sub-scores.

Growth (BDS)

33

Risk (RIS)

5

Daily limit

120min

Age guidance

9+

Developmental benefits

B1Cognitive
0.44
B2Social-emotional
0.07
B3Motor
0.45

This game offers moderate cognitive benefits through its engaging minigames, which require problem-solving, spatial awareness, hand-eye coordination, and reaction time. The linear narrative also promotes reading and language skills.

Design risks

R1Compulsion-loop pressure
0.10
R2Monetization
0.00
R3Social risk
0.00

Risks are very low. The game contains mild crude humor and language, but no significant compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, or social risks. The minigames may encourage repeated play to achieve high scores, but this is not driven by manipulative design.

Content (not in risk score)

R4.1Violence Level
0.00
R4.2Sexual Content
0.33
R4.3Language
0.33
R4.4Substance References
0.00
R4.5Fear / Horror
0.00

Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.

Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria

  • DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
  • GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
  • ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.

These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.

ReviewedJun 2026Report a data error →How scores are calculated →

Parents ask…

Is good safe for kids?

Ludograph gives good a rating of 49/100, recommended for ages 9 and up. It delivers genuine benefits but carries design risks that deserve a close look.

What age is good appropriate for?

Ludograph's rubric recommends a minimum age of 9+ for good, based on benefits, risks, and content review.

How long should kids play good?

Our session recommendation for good is up to 120 minutes per day. It is derived from the game's own structure (natural stopping points, compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, and social dynamics), not from a universal screen-time dose.

Session recommendations are design-based heuristics. Evidence linking specific daily durations to child outcomes is limited, and context matters as much as time; treat this as a starting point for household rules, not a clinical threshold.

What are the main risks of good?

Risks are very low. The game contains mild crude humor and language, but no significant compulsion-loop design, monetization pressure, or social risks. The minigames may encourage repeated play to achieve high scores, but this is not driven by manipulative design.