Review · Card · iOS
Happy Spider Solitaire
Reviewed: 14 May 2026
iOS
CHUN TAO CUI · 2013
Ludograph rating
Growth (BDS)
34
Risk (RIS)
4
Daily limit
120min
Age guidance
10+
Developmental benefits
| B1 | Cognitive | 0.54 | |
| B2 | Social-emotional | 0.03 | |
| B3 | Motor | 0.30 | |
Happy Spider Solitaire offers a classic card game experience that promotes strategic thinking, problem-solving, and critical analysis. Players must plan their moves carefully and adapt to changing card layouts, enhancing cognitive skills. It also provides a relaxing way to pass time.
Design risks
| R1 | Compulsion-loop pressure | 0.07 | |
| R2 | Monetization | 0.04 | |
| R3 | Social risk | 0.00 | |
As a single-player card game, Happy Spider Solitaire presents minimal risks. There are no social pressures, monetization schemes, or manipulative engagement mechanics. The primary 'risk' is the potential for frustration during challenging games, but this is inherent to the game's design and not a manipulative feature.
Content (not in risk score)
| R4.1 | Violence Level | 0.00 | |
| R4.2 | Sexual Content | 0.00 | |
| R4.3 | Language | 0.00 | |
| R4.4 | Substance References | 0.00 | |
| R4.5 | Fear / Horror | 0.00 | |
Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.
Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria
- DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
- GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
- ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.
These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.