Review · Board Games · Android · iOS
Jaipur: A Card Game of Duels
Reviewed: 04 Jun 2026
Android · iOS
Asmodee Digital · 2017
Ludograph rating
Growth (BDS)
41
Risk (RIS)
9
Daily limit
120min
Age guidance
–
Developmental benefits
| B1 | Cognitive | 0.66 | |
| B2 | Social-emotional | 0.17 | |
| B3 | Motor | 0.15 | |
Jaipur is a fast-paced card game for two players with a blend of tactics, risk and luck. It offers strong strategic and critical thinking challenges, as players must manage resources, anticipate opponent's moves, and optimize selling strategies. The game also provides opportunities for math systems engagement through calculating profits and set bonuses. With solo play against AI and online/local multiplayer, it offers adaptive challenge and positive social interaction when played with friends or family.
Design risks
| R1 | Compulsion-loop pressure | 0.13 | |
| R2 | Monetization | 0.00 | |
| R3 | Social risk | 0.11 | |
As a competitive two-player game, Jaipur may present minor risks of competitive toxicity and social comparison, though the absence of stranger chat mitigates direct negative interactions. The game's core mechanics, while engaging, do not rely on manipulative compulsion loops or aggressive monetization strategies, making it a low-risk option in these areas. Content risks are minimal as it is a card game.
Content (not in risk score)
| R4.1 | Violence Level | 0.00 | |
| R4.2 | Sexual Content | 0.00 | |
| R4.3 | Language | 0.00 | |
| R4.4 | Substance References | 0.00 | |
| R4.5 | Fear / Horror | 0.00 | |
Content risk is displayed separately and does not affect the time recommendation.
Regulatory design checks · DSA — Assessed: meets criteria·GDPR-K — Assessed: meets criteria·ODDS — Assessed: meets criteria
- DSA:What Ludograph checks: whether the game's design gives minors the transparency the EU Digital Services Act expects: plain terms, honest defaults, and clear reporting routes.: Estimated from review data. No dark pattern or child-targeting concerns found.
- GDPR-K:What Ludograph checks: whether age assurance and consent flows are designed for under-16s, in the spirit of GDPR Article 8.: Estimated from review data. No privacy or child-targeting concerns found.
- ODDS:What Ludograph checks: whether paid random-reward drop rates are disclosed, as required in China, Japan and South Korea.: Estimated from review data. No paid random-reward mechanics found, so drop-rate disclosure requirements do not apply.
These reflect Ludograph's assessment of the game's design practices against each framework's criteria, not a legal compliance determination.